McKerr v. United Kingdom - 28883/95 [2009] ECHR 651 (17 April 2009)
The Court found that the United Kingdom had violated its procedural obligations under Article 2 by failing to ensure effective and independent investigations into the deaths in question.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] ECHR 651
- Parties
- Applicant: Jordan; Applicant: McKerr; Applicant: Kelly and others; Applicant: Shanaghan; Applicant: McShane; Applicant: Finucane
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Multiple Applications to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment and Adoption by Committee of Ministers
- Outcome
- Violation of Article 2 found against the United Kingdom
- Legal Topics
- Right to Life, Investigation of Deaths, State Obligations, European Convention on Human Rights Article 2
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jordan
Applicant
McKerr
Applicant
Kelly and others
Applicant
Shanaghan
Applicant
McShane
Applicant
Finucane
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Multiple Applications to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment and Adoption by Committee of Ministers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the United Kingdom fulfilled its procedural obligations under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights to conduct effective investigations into deaths
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the United Kingdom had violated its procedural obligations under Article 2 by failing to ensure effective and independent investigations into the deaths in question.
Court Disposition
Violation of Article 2 found against the United Kingdom
Orders
- The United Kingdom is required to take measures to ensure effective investigations in compliance with Article 2.
- Judgments adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 March 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment