Sales Sinues (Order) French Text [2016] EUECJ C-381/14_CO (29 November 2016)
The Court found that the judgment of 14 April 2016 contained a clerical error regarding the date of the Advocate General's conclusions, which must be rectified ex officio under Article 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] EUECJ C-381/14_CO
- Parties
- Applicant: Jorge Sales Sinués; Respondent: Caixabank SA; Applicant: Youssouf Drame Ba; Respondent: Catalunya Caixa SA (Catalunya Banc SA)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling / Rectification Order
- Outcome
- Order for rectification of judgment
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Judgments, Preliminary Reference, Procedural Error
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jorge Sales Sinués
Applicant
Caixabank SA
Respondent
Youssouf Drame Ba
Applicant
Catalunya Caixa SA (Catalunya Banc SA)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Rectification Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment contained a clerical error requiring rectification under Article 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the judgment of 14 April 2016 contained a clerical error regarding the date of the Advocate General's conclusions, which must be rectified ex officio under Article 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
Court Disposition
Order for rectification of judgment
Orders
- The introductory part of the judgment of 14 April 2016 is rectified to state that the Advocate General's conclusions were heard at the hearing of 14 January 2016.
- The present order is annexed to the minute of the rectified judgment and mentioned in the margin of the rectified judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment