Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union. (Interlocutory proceedings) [2003] EUECJ T-47/03 (15 May 2003)

Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union. (Interlocutory proceedings) [2003] EUECJ T-47/03 (15 May 2003)

The absence of urgency and partial inadmissibility of the orders sought preclude granting interlocutory relief.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] EUECJ T-47/03
Parties
Applicant: Jose Maria Sison; Respondent: Council of the European Union
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Proceedings / Order
Outcome
interlocutory relief denied
Legal Topics
Restrictive Measures, Freezing of Funds, Disallowance of Benefits
European Union Law Anti Terrorism Law Restrictive Measures Freezing of Funds Disallowance of Benefits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jose Maria Sison

Applicant

Council of the European Union

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Proceedings / Order

  1. 1 whether restrictive measures including freezing of funds and disallowance of benefits are lawful
  2. 2 whether urgency exists to grant interlocutory relief

Ratio Decidendi

The absence of urgency and partial inadmissibility of the orders sought preclude granting interlocutory relief.

Court Disposition

interlocutory relief denied

Orders

  • application dismissed for lack of urgency and partial inadmissibility