KAPTAN v. TURKEY - 46749/99 [2004] ECHR 712 (22 December 2004)

The Court found that the applicant's right to property was violated and that he was not afforded a fair trial as required by the Convention.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2004] ECHR 712
Parties: Applicant: Kaptan; Respondent: Turkey
Jurisdiction: European Union
Judgment Date: 22 December 2004
Procedural Posture: Application / Final Judgment
Outcome: application allowed
Legal Topics: Right to Property, Fair Trial

Human Rights Right to Property Fair Trial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Kaptan

Applicant

Turkey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 whether the applicant's right to property was violated
2 whether the applicant was afforded a fair trial

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant's right to property was violated and that he was not afforded a fair trial as required by the Convention.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

Turkey to pay compensation to the applicant

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.