KID-Systeme v EUIPO (Appeal - EU trade mark - Order) [2019] EUECJ C-577/19P_CO (10 October 2019)
The appellant failed to demonstrate that the appeal raises an issue significant to the unity, consistency, or development of EU law; the request lacked necessary clarity, detail, and legal substantiation.
- Citation
- [2019] EUECJ C-577/19P_CO
- Parties
- Appellant: KID-Systeme GmbH; Defendant at First Instance: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); Intervener at First Instance: Sky Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Order on Whether Appeal May Proceed
- Outcome
- Appeal not allowed to proceed
- Legal Topics
- EU Trade Mark, Appeal Procedure, Opposition Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KID-Systeme GmbH
Appellant
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Defendant at First Instance
Sky Ltd
Intervener at First Instance
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Order on Whether Appeal May Proceed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal raises a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law
- 2 Whether the General Court erred in dismissing the action and ordering costs
- 3 Whether refusal to stay proceedings pending invalidity proceedings was an error
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to demonstrate that the appeal raises an issue significant to the unity, consistency, or development of EU law; the request lacked necessary clarity, detail, and legal substantiation.
Court Disposition
Appeal not allowed to proceed
Orders
- The appeal is not allowed to proceed.
- KID-Systeme GmbH shall bear its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment