KID-Systeme v EUIPO (Appeal - EU trade mark - Order) [2019] EUECJ C-577/19P_CO (10 October 2019)

KID-Systeme v EUIPO (Appeal - EU trade mark - Order) [2019] EUECJ C-577/19P_CO (10 October 2019)

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the appeal raises an issue significant to the unity, consistency, or development of EU law; the request lacked necessary clarity, detail, and legal substantiation.

Citation
[2019] EUECJ C-577/19P_CO
Parties
Appellant: KID-Systeme GmbH; Defendant at First Instance: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); Intervener at First Instance: Sky Ltd
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
10 October 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Order on Whether Appeal May Proceed
Outcome
Appeal not allowed to proceed
Legal Topics
EU Trade Mark, Appeal Procedure, Opposition Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

KID-Systeme GmbH

Appellant

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant at First Instance

Sky Ltd

Intervener at First Instance

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Order on Whether Appeal May Proceed

  1. 1 Whether the appeal raises a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law
  2. 2 Whether the General Court erred in dismissing the action and ordering costs
  3. 3 Whether refusal to stay proceedings pending invalidity proceedings was an error

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the appeal raises an issue significant to the unity, consistency, or development of EU law; the request lacked necessary clarity, detail, and legal substantiation.

Court Disposition

Appeal not allowed to proceed

Orders

  • The appeal is not allowed to proceed.
  • KID-Systeme GmbH shall bear its own costs.