O'Keeffe v. Ireland [GC] - 35810/09 - Legal Summary [2014] ECHR 173 (28 January 2014)
The State failed to fulfil its positive obligation to protect the applicant from sexual abuse by not having effective mechanisms for detection and reporting of abuse in National Schools, despite being aware of the risks. The available remedies were not effective in establishing State liability or providing redress.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] ECHR 173
- Parties
- Applicant: Louise O'Keeffe; Respondent: Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights (grand Chamber) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Violation of Article 3 (substantive aspect) and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 3; no violation of Article 3 (procedural aspect).
- Legal Topics
- State Liability, Positive Obligations, Child Protection, Sexual Abuse, Right to an Effective Remedy
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Louise O'Keeffe
Applicant
Ireland
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights (grand Chamber) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State failed to protect the applicant from sexual abuse in a state-funded National School (Article 3 ECHR)
- 2 Whether the applicant had an effective remedy for the State's failure (Article 13 in conjunction with Article 3 ECHR)
Ratio Decidendi
The State failed to fulfil its positive obligation to protect the applicant from sexual abuse by not having effective mechanisms for detection and reporting of abuse in National Schools, despite being aware of the risks. The available remedies were not effective in establishing State liability or providing redress.
Court Disposition
Violation of Article 3 (substantive aspect) and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 3; no violation of Article 3 (procedural aspect).
Orders
- Ireland to pay EUR 30,000 to the applicant in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment