Lyubov Tikhonovna BARANICHENKO v Russia - 3278/06 [2010] ECHR 1695 (30 September 2010)
The applicant failed to respond to the Court's invitation to submit observations, indicating no intention to pursue the application. No special circumstances require continued examination. The case is struck out.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] ECHR 1695
- Parties
- Applicant: Lyubov Tikhonovna Baranichenko (continued by Yevgeniya Tikhonovna Dolgova); Respondent: Russian Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility and Merits
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Right to Respect for Private and Family Life, Protection of Property, Striking Out of Application
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lyubov Tikhonovna Baranichenko (continued by Yevgeniya Tikhonovna Dolgova)
Applicant
Russian Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility and Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's rights under Article 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 were violated due to destruction of property during hostilities in Chechnya
- 2 Whether the case should be struck out for lack of interest in pursuing the application
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to respond to the Court's invitation to submit observations, indicating no intention to pursue the application. No special circumstances require continued examination. The case is struck out.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out of the list of cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Lyubov Tikhonovna BARANICHENKO v Russia - 3278/06 [2010] ECHR 1695 (30 September 2010) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/1695.html Cite as: [2010] ECHR 1695 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 3278/06 by Lyubov Tikhonovna BARANICHENKO against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 30 September 2010 as a Chamber composed of: Christos Rozakis, President , Nina Vajić, Anatoly Kovler, Elisabeth Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Dean Spielmann, Sverre Erik Jebens, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 November 2005, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Lyubov Tikhonovna Baranichenko, was a Russian national who had been born in 1924 and lived in Volgograd. She died on 24 January 2007. Her sister, Ms Yevgeniya Tikhonovna Dolgova, expressed a wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court in her stead (hereinafter referred to as “the applicant” for the sake of convenience). The Russian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr G. Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the Court. The applicant's complaint under Article 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 concerning the destruction of her property during the hostilities in Chechnya in 1999 was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit her own observations. No reply was received to the Registry's letter. By letter dated 25 March 2010, sent by registered post, the applicant was requested to submit her observations by 27 May 2010. The applicant's attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No response followed. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue her application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. André Wampach Christos Rozakis Deputy Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/1695.html