Marcel GROZA v Romania - 31017/05 [2012] ECHR 420 (8 March 2012)
The Romanian authorities acted within their margin of appreciation, prioritizing the best interests of the child based on specialist assessments. The refusal of home education did not violate the right to education, as the applicant failed to prove he could provide equivalent conditions at home. The proceedings were...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] ECHR 420
- Parties
- Applicant: Marcel Groza; Respondent: Romanian authorities
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
- Outcome
- application declared inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Right to Education, Disability Rights, Parental Rights, Fair Hearing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marcel Groza
Applicant
Romanian authorities
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal to allow home education for the applicant's disabled son violated Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (right to education) of the Convention
- 2 Whether the applicant was denied a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Romanian authorities acted within their margin of appreciation, prioritizing the best interests of the child based on specialist assessments. The refusal of home education did not violate the right to education, as the applicant failed to prove he could provide equivalent conditions at home. The proceedings were fair and not arbitrary.
Court Disposition
application declared inadmissible
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment