Mater v. Turkey - 54997/08 - Legal Summary [2013] ECHR 887 (16 July 2013)

Mater v. Turkey - 54997/08 - Legal Summary [2013] ECHR 887 (16 July 2013)

The Court found that the editorials, while forthright and critical, did not contain personal insults or calls for violence, and remained within the bounds of permissible criticism. The domestic courts had properly balanced press freedom and the applicant's rights, and there was no violation of Article 8.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] ECHR 887
Parties
Applicant: Mater; Respondent: Turkey
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
16 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment
Outcome
No violation of Article 8 (unanimously)
Legal Topics
Respect for Private Life, Freedom of Expression, Press Freedom, Defamation
Human Rights Law Media Law Respect for Private Life Freedom of Expression Press Freedom Defamation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mater

Applicant

Turkey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the publication of critical newspaper editorials violated the applicant's right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the editorials, while forthright and critical, did not contain personal insults or calls for violence, and remained within the bounds of permissible criticism. The domestic courts had properly balanced press freedom and the applicant's rights, and there was no violation of Article 8.

Court Disposition

No violation of Article 8 (unanimously)