Meta Group v Commission (Research and technological development - Judgment) French Text [2019] EUECJ C-428/17P (14 March 2019)

Meta Group v Commission (Research and technological development - Judgment) French Text [2019] EUECJ C-428/17P (14 March 2019)

The Court found no error in the Tribunal's factual assessment regarding the absence of a common intention to include the applicant's methodology in the contract, upheld the Commission's audit findings on ineligible costs, and rejected all grounds of appeal as either inadmissible, unfounded, or inoperative. The applicant failed to demonstrate breach of contract, eligibility of claimed costs, or entitlement to compensation.

Citation
[2019] EUECJ C-428/17P
Parties
Applicant: Meta Group Srl; Respondent: Commission européenne
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
14 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Research and Technological Development, Grant Agreements, Contractual Obligations, Compensation, Financial Audits
Contract Law European Union Law Research and Technological Development Grant Agreements Contractual Obligations Compensation Financial Audits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Meta Group Srl

Applicant

Commission européenne

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Commission failed to fulfill financial obligations under FP6 and CIP grant contracts
  2. 2 Eligibility of personnel costs and methodology for calculation
  3. 3 Interpretation of contractual terms and annexes

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found no error in the Tribunal's factual assessment regarding the absence of a common intention to include the applicant's methodology in the contract, upheld the Commission's audit findings on ineligible costs, and rejected all grounds of appeal as either inadmissible, unfounded, or inoperative. The applicant failed to demonstrate breach of contract, eligibility of claimed costs, or entitlement to compensation.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is rejected.
  • Meta Group Srl is condemned to pay costs.