MK (Curateur professionnel) (Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Purely personal or household activity - Judgment) [2024] EUECJ C-461/22 (11 July 2024)
A former guardian who performed duties in a professional capacity must be classified as a 'controller' under Article 4(7) GDPR regarding personal data in their possession about the former ward, and must comply with all GDPR provisions, including Article 15.
- Citation
- [2024] EUECJ C-461/22
- Parties
- Applicant: MK; Respondent: WB
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling / Judgment
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; Article 4(7) GDPR interpreted.
- Legal Topics
- GDPR, Controller Definition, Right of Access, Guardianship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MK
Applicant
WB
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a former professional guardian is a 'controller' under Article 4(7) GDPR
- 2 Whether such a guardian must comply with Article 15 GDPR obligations
Ratio Decidendi
A former guardian who performed duties in a professional capacity must be classified as a 'controller' under Article 4(7) GDPR regarding personal data in their possession about the former ward, and must comply with all GDPR provisions, including Article 15.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; Article 4(7) GDPR interpreted.
Orders
- A former professional guardian is a 'controller' under Article 4(7) GDPR for personal data in their possession concerning the former ward and must comply with all GDPR provisions, including Article 15.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment