Mohammed IBRAHIM HAYD against the Netherlands - 30880/10 [2011] ECHR 2176 (2 December 2011)

Mohammed IBRAHIM HAYD against the Netherlands - 30880/10 [2011] ECHR 2176 (2 December 2011)

The applicant's failure to maintain contact with his representative and the impossibility of establishing communication indicate loss of interest in pursuing the application, justifying striking out the case under Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. No special circumstances require continued examination.

Citation
[2011] ECHR 2176
Parties
Applicant: Mohammed Ibrahim Hayd; Respondent: Netherlands
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
02 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Striking Out Application
Outcome
application struck out
Legal Topics
Asylum, Expulsion, Right to Life, Prohibition of Torture, Right to Respect for Private and Family Life, Right to an Effective Remedy
Human Rights Immigration Law Asylum Expulsion Right to Life Prohibition of Torture Right to Respect for Private and Family Life Right to an Effective Remedy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Ibrahim Hayd

Applicant

Netherlands

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Striking Out Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application should be struck out due to loss of contact with the applicant and lack of interest in pursuing the case
  2. 2 Whether special circumstances require continued examination of the case under Article 37 § 1 of the Convention

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's failure to maintain contact with his representative and the impossibility of establishing communication indicate loss of interest in pursuing the application, justifying striking out the case under Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. No special circumstances require continued examination.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out of the list of cases.
  • The interim measure under Rule 39 is lifted.