A.A. v. SWITZERLAND - 58802/12 - Chamber Judgment [2014] ECHR 3 (07 January 2014)

A.A. v. SWITZERLAND - 58802/12 - Chamber Judgment [2014] ECHR 3 (07 January 2014)

The Court found that, given the applicant's participation in international human rights meetings and his role in the SLM-Unity, there were substantial grounds for believing he would be known to the Sudanese authorities and at risk of detention, interrogation, and torture if expelled to Sudan, thus expulsion would violate Article 3. However, the Court found no violation of Article 13 in combination with Article 3, as the Swiss authorities had not failed in their duty to scrutinize the applicant's evidence regarding his origins and risk of ill-treatment.

Citation
[2014] ECHR 3
Parties
Applicant: Mr A. A.; Respondent: Swiss Confederation
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
07 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment on Admissibility and Merits
Outcome
Application partly allowed, partly dismissed
Legal Topics
Non Refoulement, Asylum, Effective Remedy, Torture and Inhuman Treatment, Sur Place Activities
Human Rights Law Immigration Law Non Refoulement Asylum Effective Remedy Torture and Inhuman Treatment Sur Place Activities

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr A. A.

Applicant

Swiss Confederation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment on Admissibility and Merits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether expulsion of the applicant to Sudan would violate Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment)
  2. 2 Whether there was a violation of Article 13 in combination with Article 3 (right to an effective remedy)

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that, given the applicant's participation in international human rights meetings and his role in the SLM-Unity, there were substantial grounds for believing he would be known to the Sudanese authorities and at risk of detention, interrogation, and torture if expelled to Sudan, thus expulsion would violate Article 3. However, the Court found no violation of Article 13 in combination with Article 3, as the Swiss authorities had not failed in their duty to scrutinize the applicant's evidence regarding his origins and risk of ill-treatment.

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed, partly dismissed

Orders

  • Application declared admissible
  • Finding that enforcement of the expulsion order would violate Article 3 of the Convention