Criminal proceedings against Giorgio Domingo Banchero. (Preliminary rulings) [1995] EUECJ C-387/93 (14 December 1995)
Italian legislation reserving retail sale of manufactured tobacco products to authorized distributors does not violate Articles 30, 37, 86, or 90 of the EEC Treaty, provided the State does not intervene in procurement choices and access for imported products is not impeded more than for domestic products. Penal provisions for possession of tobacco products on which excise duty has not been paid are not precluded by Article 30 if they do not hinder importation and apply equally to domestic and imported products.
- Citation
- [1995] EUECJ C-387/93
- Parties
- Defendant: Mr Banchero; Prosecution: Italian authorities
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Preliminary Ruling
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; national legislation upheld as compatible with EEC Treaty provisions.
- Legal Topics
- State Monopoly, Free Movement of Goods, Distribution of Manufactured Tobacco, Smuggling, Dominant Position, Penalties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Banchero
Defendant
Italian authorities
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Preliminary Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Compatibility of Italian tobacco monopoly and distribution system with EEC Treaty provisions
- 2 Whether penal provisions for possession of foreign tobacco products contravene Article 30
- 3 Whether retail distribution monopoly constitutes abuse of dominant position
Ratio Decidendi
Italian legislation reserving retail sale of manufactured tobacco products to authorized distributors does not violate Articles 30, 37, 86, or 90 of the EEC Treaty, provided the State does not intervene in procurement choices and access for imported products is not impeded more than for domestic products. Penal provisions for possession of tobacco products on which excise duty has not been paid are not precluded by Article 30 if they do not hinder importation and apply equally to domestic and imported products.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; national legislation upheld as compatible with EEC Treaty provisions.
Orders
- Article 37 EEC Treaty not relevant if State does not intervene in procurement choices.
- Legislation reserving retail sale to authorized distributors does not fall within Article 30 if access is not barred or impeded for imported products.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment