Grongaard & Bang (Approximation of laws) [2005] EUECJ C-384/02 (22 November 2005)
Article 3(a) of Directive 89/592/EEC precludes disclosure of inside information by employee representatives or trade union officials unless there is a close link between the disclosure and the exercise of their employment, profession or duties, and the disclosure is strictly necessary for that purpose; this...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] EUECJ C-384/02
- Parties
- Defendant: Mr Grøngaard; Defendant: Mr Bang; Referring Court: Københavns Byret (Copenhagen District Court)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference for Preliminary Ruling / Preliminary Ruling by Court of Justice of the European Union
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; Article 3(a) of Directive 89/592/EEC precludes disclosure of inside information by employee representatives or trade union officials except under strict necessity and close link to duties, to be assessed by the national court.
- Legal Topics
- Insider Dealing, Disclosure of Inside Information, Interpretation of Directive 89/592/eec, Exceptions to Prohibition of Disclosure, Employee Representatives, Trade Unions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Grøngaard
Defendant
Mr Bang
Defendant
Københavns Byret (Copenhagen District Court)
Referring Court
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference for Preliminary Ruling / Preliminary Ruling by Court of Justice of the European Union
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 3(a) of Directive 89/592/EEC allows disclosure of inside information by employee representatives or trade union officials in specified circumstances
- 2 Scope and strictness of the exception for disclosure in the normal course of employment, profession or duties
Ratio Decidendi
Article 3(a) of Directive 89/592/EEC precludes disclosure of inside information by employee representatives or trade union officials unless there is a close link between the disclosure and the exercise of their employment, profession or duties, and the disclosure is strictly necessary for that purpose; this exception must be interpreted strictly and assessed in light of national law and the sensitivity of the information.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; Article 3(a) of Directive 89/592/EEC precludes disclosure of inside information by employee representatives or trade union officials except under strict necessity and close link to duties, to be assessed by the national court.
Orders
- National court must assess if disclosure was strictly necessary and closely linked to duties under national law, interpreting the exception strictly and considering the sensitivity of the information and risk of misuse.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment