M.I. v. SWITZERLAND - 56390/21 (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Third Section) [2024] ECHR 862 (12 November 2024)
Swiss authorities failed to sufficiently assess the applicant's risk of ill-treatment as a homosexual man in Iran and the availability of State protection against harm by non-State actors; removal without a fresh assessment would breach Article 3 of the Convention.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] ECHR 862
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr M. I.; Respondent: Swiss Confederation
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Judgment by European Court of Human Rights (third Section)
- Outcome
- Violation of Article 3 of the Convention; complaint admissible; no need to examine separately Article 13 and Article 14 complaints; finding of violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damage; costs and expenses awarded; remainder of claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Expulsion, Asylum, Sexual Orientation, State Protection, Non State Actor Persecution, Article 3 ECHR
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr M. I.
Applicant
Swiss Confederation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Judgment by European Court of Human Rights (third Section)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expulsion of a homosexual man to Iran would violate Article 3 of the Convention due to risk of ill-treatment
- 2 Whether Swiss authorities sufficiently assessed risk of ill-treatment and availability of State protection against non-State actors
Ratio Decidendi
Swiss authorities failed to sufficiently assess the applicant's risk of ill-treatment as a homosexual man in Iran and the availability of State protection against harm by non-State actors; removal without a fresh assessment would breach Article 3 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
Violation of Article 3 of the Convention; complaint admissible; no need to examine separately Article 13 and Article 14 complaints; finding of violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damage; costs and expenses awarded; remainder of claim dismissed.
Orders
- Swiss Government not to expel applicant until judgment becomes final or further decision is made.
- Swiss Government to pay applicant EUR 7,000 in respect of costs and expenses within three months, plus any tax chargeable, converted to respondent State currency at settlement date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment