Criminal proceedings against Jean-Louis Maurin. (Community law) [1996] EUECJ C-144/95 (13 June 1996)

Criminal proceedings against Jean-Louis Maurin. (Community law) [1996] EUECJ C-144/95 (13 June 1996)

The Court does not have jurisdiction to determine whether procedural rules applicable to offences under national legislation which falls outside the scope of Community law may breach the principles concerning observance of the rights of the defence and of the adversarial nature of proceedings.

Citation
[1996] EUECJ C-144/95
Parties
Defendant: Mr Maurin; Intervener: French Government; Intervener: United Kingdom; Intervener: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
13 June 1996
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Reference From National Court (tribunal De Police, Toulouse)
Outcome
Court lacks jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Rights of the Defence, Adversarial Proceedings, Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice, Labelling and Sale of Food Products
Criminal Law European Union Law Rights of the Defence Adversarial Proceedings Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice Labelling and Sale of Food Products

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Maurin

Defendant

French Government

Intervener

United Kingdom

Intervener

Commission of the European Communities

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Ruling / Reference From National Court (tribunal De Police, Toulouse)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the procedure for establishing an offence under French law, specifically the lack of a signature by the person concerned on a police report, is compatible with general principles of EU law such as the rights of the defence and adversarial proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the Court of Justice has jurisdiction to rule on procedural rules under national legislation falling outside the scope of Community law

Ratio Decidendi

The Court does not have jurisdiction to determine whether procedural rules applicable to offences under national legislation which falls outside the scope of Community law may breach the principles concerning observance of the rights of the defence and of the adversarial nature of proceedings.

Court Disposition

Court lacks jurisdiction

Orders

  • The Court does not have jurisdiction to determine whether procedural rules applicable to offences under national legislation which falls outside the scope of Community law may be in breach of the principles concerning observance of the rights of the defence and of the adversarial nature of proceedings.