Van de Walle & Ors v Texaco Belgium SA (Environment and consumers) [2004] EUECJ C-1/03 (7 September 2004)

Van de Walle & Ors v Texaco Belgium SA (Environment and consumers) [2004] EUECJ C-1/03 (7 September 2004)

Hydrocarbons unintentionally spilled and causing soil and groundwater contamination are waste under Directive 75/442. Contaminated soil is also waste, even if not excavated. The petroleum undertaking supplying the service station is the holder of waste only if the leak can be attributed to its conduct.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] EUECJ C-1/03
Parties
Defendant: Mr Van de Walle; Defendant: Mr Laurent; Defendant: Mr Mersch; Defendant: Texaco Belgium SA; Claimant: Brussels-Capital Region
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
07 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Reference / Court of Justice Ruling
Outcome
Preliminary ruling issued; interpretation provided
Legal Topics
Waste Definition, Hazardous Waste, Polluter Pays Principle, Holder and Producer Liability, Accidental Pollution
Environmental Law EU Law Criminal Law Waste Definition Hazardous Waste Polluter Pays Principle Holder and Producer Liability Accidental Pollution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Van de Walle

Defendant

Mr Laurent

Defendant

Mr Mersch

Defendant

Texaco Belgium SA

Defendant

Brussels-Capital Region

Claimant

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Reference / Court of Justice Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Are hydrocarbons unintentionally spilled and causing soil and groundwater contamination classified as waste under Directive 75/442?
  2. 2 Is contaminated soil considered waste even if not excavated?
  3. 3 Can a petroleum company supplying hydrocarbons be considered the holder or producer of waste under Directive 75/442?

Ratio Decidendi

Hydrocarbons unintentionally spilled and causing soil and groundwater contamination are waste under Directive 75/442. Contaminated soil is also waste, even if not excavated. The petroleum undertaking supplying the service station is the holder of waste only if the leak can be attributed to its conduct.

Court Disposition

Preliminary ruling issued; interpretation provided

Orders

  • Hydrocarbons unintentionally spilled and causing contamination are waste under Directive 75/442.
  • Contaminated soil is waste even if not excavated.