van der Woude (Competition) [2000] EUECJ C-222/98 (21 September 2000)
The provisions of the collective labour agreement relating to sickness insurance and restricting employer contributions to selected insurers are compatible with Articles 85 and 86 EC, as they are the result of collective bargaining intended to improve working conditions and do not constitute anti-competitive conduct...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] EUECJ C-222/98
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Van der Woude; Respondent: Beatrixoord
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling / Referral From National Court
- Outcome
- Provisions of the collective labour agreement are compatible with Articles 85 and 86 EC Treaty.
- Legal Topics
- Collective Labour Agreements, Sickness Insurance, Employer Contributions, Competition Rules
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Van der Woude
Applicant
Beatrixoord
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Referral From National Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Are provisions of a collective labour agreement restricting employer contributions to selected insurers compatible with Articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty?
Ratio Decidendi
The provisions of the collective labour agreement relating to sickness insurance and restricting employer contributions to selected insurers are compatible with Articles 85 and 86 EC, as they are the result of collective bargaining intended to improve working conditions and do not constitute anti-competitive conduct or abuse of dominant position.
Court Disposition
Provisions of the collective labour agreement are compatible with Articles 85 and 86 EC Treaty.
Orders
- National court to decide costs.
- No recovery of costs for Netherlands, Swedish, UK Governments and Commission.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment