Lindqvist (Approximation of laws) [2003] EUECJ C-101/01 (06 November 2003)
Publishing personal data about individuals on an internet page using a computer constitutes processing of personal data by automatic means under Directive 95/46/EC. Such processing is not covered by the exceptions for personal or household activities or activities outside Community law. Reference to health...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] EUECJ C-101/01
- Parties
- Defendant: Mrs Lindqvist; Prosecutor: Public Prosecutor (Sweden)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Preliminary Reference From National Appellate Court (göta Hovrätt) to European Court of Justice
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; interpretation of Directive 95/46/EC provided to referring court.
- Legal Topics
- Processing of Personal Data, Scope of Directive 95/46/ec, Exceptions to Data Protection Rules, Sensitive Personal Data, Transfer of Data to Third Countries, Freedom of Expression, National Implementation of EU Directives
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Lindqvist
Defendant
Public Prosecutor (Sweden)
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Preliminary Reference From National Appellate Court (göta Hovrätt) to European Court of Justice
Legal Issues
- 1 Does mentioning individuals by name and other identifiers on an internet page constitute processing of personal data by automatic means under Directive 95/46/EC?
- 2 Are such activities covered by exceptions in Article 3(2) of Directive 95/46/EC?
- 3 Does reference to health information constitute sensitive personal data?
Ratio Decidendi
Publishing personal data about individuals on an internet page using a computer constitutes processing of personal data by automatic means under Directive 95/46/EC. Such processing is not covered by the exceptions for personal or household activities or activities outside Community law. Reference to health information is sensitive personal data. Making data accessible online does not amount to a transfer to third countries. The Directive does not, in itself, violate freedom of expression, but national authorities must ensure proportionality and balance of rights. Member States must comply with the Directive's harmonisation but may extend national law to areas not covered by the Directive.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; interpretation of Directive 95/46/EC provided to referring court.
Orders
- Referring to individuals by name or other identifiers on an internet page is processing of personal data by automatic means under Directive 95/46/EC.
- Such processing is not covered by exceptions in Article 3(2) of the Directive.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment