Laezza (Judgment) [2016] EUECJ C-375/14 (28 January 2016)
Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU preclude a national provision requiring licensees to transfer, free of charge, tangible and intangible assets used for betting operations upon cessation of business due to licence expiry, insofar as such a restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the legitimate objective pursued; it is for the referring court to verify proportionality and necessity.
- Citation
- [2016] EUECJ C-375/14
- Parties
- Defendant: Ms Laezza; Interested Party: Stanley International Betting Ltd; Interested Party: Stanleybet Malta Ltd; Regulatory Authority: Customs and Monopolies Agency (CMA)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference for a Preliminary Ruling) / Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (third Chamber)
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling: Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU preclude a national provision requiring free-of-charge transfer of assets upon licence expiry if disproportionate; referring court to verify necessity.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Establishment, Freedom to Provide Services, Public Gambling Regulation, Proportionality, Non Discrimination, Licensing Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Laezza
Defendant
Stanley International Betting Ltd
Interested Party
Stanleybet Malta Ltd
Interested Party
Customs and Monopolies Agency (CMA)
Regulatory Authority
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference for a Preliminary Ruling) / Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (third Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU preclude a national provision requiring licensees to transfer, free of charge, tangible and intangible assets used for betting operations upon cessation of business due to licence expiry or revocation.
Ratio Decidendi
Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU preclude a national provision requiring licensees to transfer, free of charge, tangible and intangible assets used for betting operations upon cessation of business due to licence expiry, insofar as such a restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the legitimate objective pursued; it is for the referring court to verify proportionality and necessity.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling: Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU preclude a national provision requiring free-of-charge transfer of assets upon licence expiry if disproportionate; referring court to verify necessity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment