Namik Kemal OZMEN v Turkey - 4545/05 [2009] ECHR 1376 (1 September 2009)
The Court found the friendly settlement to be based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols, and found no public policy reasons to continue examining the application.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] ECHR 1376
- Parties
- Applicant: Namık Kemal Özmen; Respondent: Republic of Turkey
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Final Decision on Friendly Settlement
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Length of Administrative Proceedings, Article 6 ECHR, Friendly Settlement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Namık Kemal Özmen
Applicant
Republic of Turkey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Final Decision on Friendly Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of administrative proceedings violated Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the friendly settlement to be based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols, and found no public policy reasons to continue examining the application.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out of the list of cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Namik Kemal OZMEN v Turkey - 4545/05 [2009] ECHR 1376 (1 September 2009) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/1376.html Cite as: [2009] ECHR 1376 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] SECOND SECTION FINAL DECISION Application no. 4545/05 by Namık Kemal ÖZMEN against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 1 September 2009 as a Chamber composed of: Françoise Tulkens, President, Ireneu Cabral Barreto, Vladimiro Zagrebelsky, Danutė Jočienė, András Sajó, Nona Tsotsoria, Işıl Karakaş, judges, and Sally Dollé, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 18 December 2004, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having regard to the partial decision of 3 March 2009, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Namık Kemal Özmen, is a Turkish national who was born in 1959 and lives in Ankara. He was not represented by a lawyer in the proceedings before the Court. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. On 3 March 2009 the Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint concerning the length of administrative proceedings under Article 6, which began on 24 June 1992 and ended on 15 April 2004. On 6 April 2009 and 3 June 2009 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties by which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 6,500 euros to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Turkish liras at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and free of any taxes that may be applicable. This sum would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period, plus three percentage points. The payment would constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Sally Dollé Françoise Tulkens Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/1376.html