Nicole and Sebastian DITZ v Germany - 29056/06 [2009] ECHR 999 (2 June 2009)
The application was manifestly ill-founded because the domestic courts addressed all relevant arguments, provided sufficient reasoning, and the absence of an oral hearing at the appellate stage was justified given the circumstances. There was no appearance of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
- Citation
- [2009] ECHR 999
- Parties
- Applicant: Nicole Ditz; Applicant: Sebastian Ditz; Respondent: Germany
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
- Outcome
- application inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Right to a Fair Trial, Right to Be Heard, Procedural Fairness, Admissibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicole Ditz
Applicant
Sebastian Ditz
Applicant
Germany
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' right to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention was violated by the domestic courts' handling of their civil claim, including the absence of an oral hearing at the appellate stage and the assessment of evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The application was manifestly ill-founded because the domestic courts addressed all relevant arguments, provided sufficient reasoning, and the absence of an oral hearing at the appellate stage was justified given the circumstances. There was no appearance of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
application inadmissible
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment