Nippon Seiko KK and others v Council and Commission of the European Communities. [1977] EUECJ C-119/77R (20 October 1977)

Nippon Seiko KK and others v Council and Commission of the European Communities. [1977] EUECJ C-119/77R (20 October 1977)

The applicants substantiated urgency and a prima facie case for suspension of Article 3 as regards sums not yet paid, and the respondents failed to show that interim suspension would cause appreciable detriment if security was maintained; therefore, suspension is granted on condition of continued security.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1977] EUECJ C-119/77R
Parties
Applicant: Nippon Seiko K.K.; Applicant: NSK Bearings Europe Ltd.; Applicant: NSK Kugellager GmbH; Applicant: NSK France S.A.; Respondent: Council of the European Communities; Respondent: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for Interim Measures / Order on Interim Measures Pending Main Action
Outcome
interim suspension of Article 3 of Regulation No 1778/77 granted subject to security; costs reserved
Legal Topics
Suspension of Regulation, Interim Measures, Customs Duties, Security for Payment
European Union Law Administrative Law Suspension of Regulation Interim Measures Customs Duties Security for Payment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nippon Seiko K.K.

Applicant

NSK Bearings Europe Ltd.

Applicant

NSK Kugellager GmbH

Applicant

NSK France S.A.

Applicant

Council of the European Communities

Respondent

Commission of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application for Interim Measures / Order on Interim Measures Pending Main Action

  1. 1 Whether interim suspension of Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1778/77 should be granted pending the main action
  2. 2 Whether urgency and prima facie case for suspension are established

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants substantiated urgency and a prima facie case for suspension of Article 3 as regards sums not yet paid, and the respondents failed to show that interim suspension would cause appreciable detriment if security was maintained; therefore, suspension is granted on condition of continued security.

Court Disposition

interim suspension of Article 3 of Regulation No 1778/77 granted subject to security; costs reserved

Orders

  • Suspension of application of Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1778/77 to the applicants as regards sums not yet paid, conditional on continued security, until final judgment in the main case.
  • Costs reserved for final judgment.