Odabasi and Kocak v Turkey - 50959/99 [2010] ECHR 971 (3 June 2010)
The European Court found that the applicants' conviction was not necessary in a democratic society as the statements did not target Atatürk personally, did not incite violence, and were based on information already available to the public, thus constituting a violation of Article 10.
- Citation
- [2010] ECHR 971
- Parties
- Applicant: Odabaşı; Applicant: Koçak; Respondent: Turkey
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment and Closure of Supervision
- Outcome
- Supervision of execution closed; Turkey complied with obligations under Article 46.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Defamation, Criminal Conviction, Execution of ECHR Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Odabaşı
Applicant
Koçak
Applicant
Turkey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment and Closure of Supervision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' criminal conviction for publishing a book constituted unjustified interference with their freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The European Court found that the applicants' conviction was not necessary in a democratic society as the statements did not target Atatürk personally, did not incite violence, and were based on information already available to the public, thus constituting a violation of Article 10.
Court Disposition
Supervision of execution closed; Turkey complied with obligations under Article 46.
Orders
- Payment of just satisfaction to applicants
- Suspension of sentences and erasure of convictions from criminal records
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment