SGAE (Intellectual property) [2010] EUECJ C-467/08_O (11 May 2010)
The concept of 'fair compensation' in Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC is an autonomous Community law concept requiring uniform interpretation and application across Member States, but Member States retain discretion to determine criteria and methods for implementation within the limits of EU law. The levy system must ensure a fair balance between rightholders and users, and compensation need not be strictly linked to harm but may consider multiple criteria. Indiscriminate application of levies to all devices, including those used for professional purposes, may not be compatible with the directive if not linked to presumed private copying use.
- Citation
- [2010] EUECJ C-467/08_O
- Parties
- Claimant: Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (SGAE); Defendant: Padawan S. L.
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Reference for a Preliminary Ruling / Opinion of Advocate General
- Outcome
- Reference for a preliminary ruling is admissible; Advocate General's opinion delivered.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright, Fair Compensation, Private Copying, Directive 2001/29/ec, Levy System
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (SGAE)
Claimant
Padawan S. L.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Reference for a Preliminary Ruling / Opinion of Advocate General
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of 'fair compensation' under Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC
- 2 Compatibility of Spanish levy system with EU law
- 3 Criteria for fair compensation and its link to harm caused by private copying
Ratio Decidendi
The concept of 'fair compensation' in Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC is an autonomous Community law concept requiring uniform interpretation and application across Member States, but Member States retain discretion to determine criteria and methods for implementation within the limits of EU law. The levy system must ensure a fair balance between rightholders and users, and compensation need not be strictly linked to harm but may consider multiple criteria. Indiscriminate application of levies to all devices, including those used for professional purposes, may not be compatible with the directive if not linked to presumed private copying use.
Court Disposition
Reference for a preliminary ruling is admissible; Advocate General's opinion delivered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment