PARADISO v. ITALY - 41816/98 [2000] ECHR 66 (8 February 2000)

The Court determined whether the interference with the applicant's rights was justified under Article 8(2) of the Convention.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2000] ECHR 66
Parties: Applicant: Paradiso; Respondent: Italy
Jurisdiction: European Union
Procedural Posture: Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment
Outcome: judgment for the applicant
Legal Topics: Right to Respect for Private and Family Life, Article 8 ECHR

Human Rights Law Right to Respect for Private and Family Life Article 8 ECHR

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Paradiso

Applicant

Italy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant's rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights were violated

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined whether the interference with the applicant's rights was justified under Article 8(2) of the Convention.

Court Disposition

judgment for the applicant

Orders

Italy found to have violated Article 8 of the Convention

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.