Paul Vannieuwenhuyze-Morin v Council of the European Union and European Parliament. (Action for annulment) [2003] EUECJ T-321/02 (6 May 2003)

Paul Vannieuwenhuyze-Morin v Council of the European Union and European Parliament. (Action for annulment) [2003] EUECJ T-321/02 (6 May 2003)

The Court found the action inadmissible as the applicant did not meet the requirements for admissibility under Article 230 EC.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] EUECJ T-321/02
Parties
Applicant: Paul Vannieuwenhuyze-Morin; Respondent: Council of the European Union; Respondent: European Parliament
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Action for Annulment / Order on Admissibility
Outcome
action dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Annulment, Admissibility, Directive 2002/58/ec
European Union Law Administrative Law Annulment Admissibility Directive 2002/58/ec

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Vannieuwenhuyze-Morin

Applicant

Council of the European Union

Respondent

European Parliament

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Action for Annulment / Order on Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the action for annulment against Directive 2002/58/EC is admissible

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found the action inadmissible as the applicant did not meet the requirements for admissibility under Article 230 EC.

Court Disposition

action dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • The action is dismissed as inadmissible.