Pretura unificata di Torino v X. [1988] EUECJ R-228/87 (22 September 1988)
Article 10(1) of Directive 80/778/EEC permits derogations from maximum permitted concentrations in water for human consumption only in urgent situations, for the time necessary to restore water quality, without posing unacceptable risk to public health, and only if the supply cannot be maintained otherwise.
- Citation
- [1988] EUECJ R-228/87
- Parties
- Referring Court: Pretura unificata di Torino (The Turin Magistrates' Court); Defendant: Persons unknown (criminal proceedings); Intervener: Commission of the European Communities; Intervener: Italian Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (article 177 Eec) / Judgment on Reference for Preliminary Ruling
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued: Article 10(1) of Directive 80/778/EEC interpreted as permitting derogations only in urgent situations, for a limited period, without unacceptable risk to health, and only if no alternative supply is possible.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Directive 80/778/eec, Water Quality Standards, Derogations From EU Directives, Public Health Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pretura unificata di Torino (The Turin Magistrates' Court)
Referring Court
Persons unknown (criminal proceedings)
Defendant
Commission of the European Communities
Intervener
Italian Government
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (article 177 Eec) / Judgment on Reference for Preliminary Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 10(1) of Directive 80/778/EEC authorizes Member States to introduce derogations in the manner and circumstances as done by the Italian authorities regarding water quality standards.
Ratio Decidendi
Article 10(1) of Directive 80/778/EEC permits derogations from maximum permitted concentrations in water for human consumption only in urgent situations, for the time necessary to restore water quality, without posing unacceptable risk to public health, and only if the supply cannot be maintained otherwise.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued: Article 10(1) of Directive 80/778/EEC interpreted as permitting derogations only in urgent situations, for a limited period, without unacceptable risk to health, and only if no alternative supply is possible.
Orders
- Authorization to exceed maximum permitted concentrations must be granted only in urgent situations involving sudden difficulties in water supply.
- Such authorization must be limited to the time necessary to restore water quality, must not pose unacceptable risk to health, and may be given only if supply cannot be maintained otherwise.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment