RAIDL v AUSTRIA - 25342/94 [1995] ECHR 93 (4 September 1995)

The Court found that the length of the proceedings did not exceed a reasonable time and therefore there was no violation of Article 6.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [1995] ECHR 93
Parties: Applicant: Raidl; Respondent: Austria
Jurisdiction: European Union
Judgment Date: 04 September 1995
Procedural Posture: Application / Decision on Admissibility
Outcome: application declared inadmissible
Legal Topics: Right to a Fair Trial, Access to Court

Human Rights Law Right to a Fair Trial Access to Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Raidl

Applicant

Austria

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Decision on Admissibility

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant's right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights was violated

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the length of the proceedings did not exceed a reasonable time and therefore there was no violation of Article 6.

Court Disposition

application declared inadmissible

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.