Ravil (Free movement of goods) [2003] EUECJ C-469/00 (20 May 2003)
A requirement that Grana Padano cheese be grated and packaged in the region of production constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on exports under Article 29 EC, but is justified by the protection of industrial and commercial property, specifically the reputation, quality, and authenticity of the PDO. Regulation No 2081/92 does not preclude such a condition if laid down in the specification. However, the condition cannot be relied upon against economic operators unless it was adequately publicized in Community legislation or, for pre-1107/96 activities, if national publicity rules applied.
- Citation
- [2003] EUECJ C-469/00
- Parties
- Applicant: Ravil SARL; Respondent: Biraghi SpA; Respondent: Bellon import SARL
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling / Judgment
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; national court to apply findings to main proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Protected Designations of Origin, Free Movement of Goods, Quantitative Restrictions, Industrial and Commercial Property, Legal Certainty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ravil SARL
Applicant
Biraghi SpA
Respondent
Bellon import SARL
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether national or bilateral measures reserving the Grana Padano designation for cheese grated and packaged in the region of production constitute prohibited quantitative restrictions under Article 29 EC
- 2 Whether such restrictions are justified by protection of industrial and commercial property
- 3 Whether Regulation No 2081/92 precludes PDO use from being subject to grating and packaging conditions
Ratio Decidendi
A requirement that Grana Padano cheese be grated and packaged in the region of production constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on exports under Article 29 EC, but is justified by the protection of industrial and commercial property, specifically the reputation, quality, and authenticity of the PDO. Regulation No 2081/92 does not preclude such a condition if laid down in the specification. However, the condition cannot be relied upon against economic operators unless it was adequately publicized in Community legislation or, for pre-1107/96 activities, if national publicity rules applied.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; national court to apply findings to main proceedings.
Orders
- Article 29 EC does not preclude a bilateral convention making applicable national legislation reserving the designation for cheese grated and packaged in the region of production.
- Regulation No 2081/92 does not preclude PDO use from being subject to grating and packaging conditions if specified.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment