Riolo v Italy - 42211/07 [2010] ECHR 979 (3 June 2010)
The European Court found that the applicant's article, though provocative, addressed matters of general interest and did not constitute a gratuitous attack. The penalties imposed were disproportionate to the aim of protecting the reputation and rights of others, resulting in a violation of Article 10.
- Citation
- [2010] ECHR 979
- Parties
- Applicant: Riolo; Respondent: Italy
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment; Post Final Judgment Compliance Review
- Outcome
- Case closed; Italy complied with the judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Defamation, Article 10 ECHR, Just Satisfaction, Restitutio in Integrum
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Riolo
Applicant
Italy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment; Post Final Judgment Compliance Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction of the applicant for defamation constituted a disproportionate interference with the right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The European Court found that the applicant's article, though provocative, addressed matters of general interest and did not constitute a gratuitous attack. The penalties imposed were disproportionate to the aim of protecting the reputation and rights of others, resulting in a violation of Article 10.
Court Disposition
Case closed; Italy complied with the judgment.
Orders
- Italy paid the applicant EUR 72,000 in just satisfaction.
- No further individual measures required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment