Robert Pfleger, Mladen Vucicevic, Maroxx Software GmbH, Ing. Hans-Jorg Zehetner [2013] EUECJ C-390/12 (14 November 2013)
National legislation restricting the organisation of games of chance to a limited number of licensed operators, enforced by criminal and administrative penalties, is precluded by Article 56 TFEU unless justified by overriding public interest objectives (such as consumer protection or crime prevention), pursued consistently and proportionately. The Charter applies to such derogations. Criminal liability may only extend to those who knew or ought to have known of their contribution to the breach. Automatic confiscation and destruction of gaming machines without consideration of culpability is disproportionate and precluded by EU law.
- Citation
- [2013] EUECJ C-390/12
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Pfleger; Applicant: Autoart a.s.; Applicant: Mladen Vucicevic; Applicant: Maroxx Software GmbH; Applicant: Ing. Hans-Jörg Zehetner; Referring Court: Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich (Austria)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (cjeu) / Opinion of Advocate General
- Outcome
- Preliminary opinion: National law precluded unless justified, consistent, and proportionate; criminal liability and penalties must be limited and proportionate; automatic confiscation/destruction without regard to culpability is precluded.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom to Provide Services, Games of Chance Regulation, Proportionality, Charter of Fundamental Rights, Licensing of Gaming Machines, Criminal and Administrative Penalties, Property Rights, Rule of Law, Legal Certainty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Pfleger
Applicant
Autoart a.s.
Applicant
Mladen Vucicevic
Applicant
Maroxx Software GmbH
Applicant
Ing. Hans-Jörg Zehetner
Applicant
Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich (Austria)
Referring Court
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (cjeu) / Opinion of Advocate General
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Austrian legislation restricting gaming machines to licensed operators in limited numbers, with criminal and administrative penalties, is compatible with Article 56 TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, particularly regarding proportionality, legal certainty, and property rights.
Ratio Decidendi
National legislation restricting the organisation of games of chance to a limited number of licensed operators, enforced by criminal and administrative penalties, is precluded by Article 56 TFEU unless justified by overriding public interest objectives (such as consumer protection or crime prevention), pursued consistently and proportionately. The Charter applies to such derogations. Criminal liability may only extend to those who knew or ought to have known of their contribution to the breach. Automatic confiscation and destruction of gaming machines without consideration of culpability is disproportionate and precluded by EU law.
Court Disposition
Preliminary opinion: National law precluded unless justified, consistent, and proportionate; criminal liability and penalties must be limited and proportionate; automatic confiscation/destruction without regard to culpability is precluded.
Orders
- Article 56 TFEU precludes national legislation restricting games of chance to limited licensees unless justified, consistent, and proportionate; national court to determine if criteria are met.
- Criminal liability may extend only to those who knew or ought to have known their actions contributed to the breach.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment