Rodic and 3 others - 22893/05 v Bosnia and Herzegovina - 34320/09 [2011] ECHR 1568 (20 September 2011)

Rodic and 3 others - 22893/05 v Bosnia and Herzegovina - 34320/09 [2011] ECHR 1568 (20 September 2011)

The respondent state complied with the judgment by paying just satisfaction and implementing sufficient individual and general measures to remedy the violations and prevent recurrence, thus fulfilling its obligations under Article 46(2) of the Convention.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] ECHR 1568
Parties
Applicant: Rodić and 3 others; Respondent: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Application / Execution of Judgment / Final Resolution
Outcome
Examination closed; respondent state found to have complied with the judgment.
Legal Topics
Prison Conditions, Treatment of Prisoners, Execution of European Court of Human Rights Judgments
Human Rights Law Criminal Law Prison Conditions Treatment of Prisoners Execution of European Court of Human Rights Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rodić and 3 others

Applicant

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Application / Execution of Judgment / Final Resolution

  1. 1 Whether Bosnia and Herzegovina violated the European Convention on Human Rights regarding the treatment and safety of prisoners, specifically war crime convicts
  2. 2 Whether adequate individual and general measures were taken to remedy and prevent similar violations

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent state complied with the judgment by paying just satisfaction and implementing sufficient individual and general measures to remedy the violations and prevent recurrence, thus fulfilling its obligations under Article 46(2) of the Convention.

Court Disposition

Examination closed; respondent state found to have complied with the judgment.

Orders

  • Declared that the Committee of Ministers has exercised its functions under Article 46(2) of the Convention and decided to close the examination of the case.