Roger Buyl and others v Commission of the European Communities. [1982] EUECJ C-817/79 (4 February 1982)

Roger Buyl and others v Commission of the European Communities. [1982] EUECJ C-817/79 (4 February 1982)

The Court held that the required consultation with the Parliament was satisfied as the regulation adopted conformed in substance to the proposal submitted, with only methodological changes. The adoption of updated exchange rates did not breach vested rights or legitimate expectations, as no assurance was given that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1982] EUECJ C-817/79
Parties
Applicant: Roger Buyl and nineteen other officials of the Commission employed at the Geel Joint Research Centre (Belgium); Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Application for Annulment / Final Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Staff Regulations, Remuneration, Exchange Rates, Procedural Requirements, Non Discrimination
European Union Law Employment Law Administrative Law Staff Regulations Remuneration Exchange Rates Procedural Requirements Non Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roger Buyl and nineteen other officials of the Commission employed at the Geel Joint Research Centre (Belgium)

Applicant

Commission of the European Communities

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Annulment / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the adoption of Regulation No 3085/78 and related decisions breached essential procedural requirements, including consultation with the European Parliament under Article 24 of the Merger Treaty.
  2. 2 Whether the new system for calculating exchange rates for remuneration transfers infringed vested rights and legitimate expectations of officials.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of transitional provisions for serving officials, as compared to pensioners, constituted unlawful discrimination.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the required consultation with the Parliament was satisfied as the regulation adopted conformed in substance to the proposal submitted, with only methodological changes. The adoption of updated exchange rates did not breach vested rights or legitimate expectations, as no assurance was given that the previous system would be maintained indefinitely. The difference in transitional provisions between serving officials and pensioners did not constitute discrimination, as their situations are not identical.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed as unfounded.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.