ANAMARIA-LOREDANA ORASANU v. ROMANIA - 43629/13 (Judgment : Violation of Right to life - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)) [2017] ECHR 972 (07 November 2017)
The Court found that the Romanian authorities failed to conduct an effective investigation into the deaths and injuries resulting from the violent suppression of the December 1989 demonstrations, as required by the procedural limb of Article 2 of the Convention. The investigation was excessively lengthy, lacked involvement of victims or their relatives, and failed to provide adequate information about its progress. These procedural deficiencies constituted a violation of Article 2.
- Citation
- [2017] ECHR 972
- Parties
- Applicants: Anamaria-Loredana Orășanu and Others; Respondent: Romanian Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights Under Article 34 of the Convention / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Violation of Article 2 of the Convention (procedural limb) found; other complaints not examined; just satisfaction awarded for non-pecuniary damage; remainder of claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Life, Effective Investigation, Procedural Obligations Under Article 2, Excessive Length of Proceedings, Non Pecuniary Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anamaria-Loredana Orășanu and Others
Applicants
Romanian Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights Under Article 34 of the Convention / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Romanian authorities conducted an effective, impartial, and thorough investigation into the violent crackdown on the December 1989 demonstrations resulting in deaths and injuries
- 2 Whether the applicants had an effective remedy for their complaints under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Romanian authorities failed to conduct an effective investigation into the deaths and injuries resulting from the violent suppression of the December 1989 demonstrations, as required by the procedural limb of Article 2 of the Convention. The investigation was excessively lengthy, lacked involvement of victims or their relatives, and failed to provide adequate information about its progress. These procedural deficiencies constituted a violation of Article 2.
Court Disposition
Violation of Article 2 of the Convention (procedural limb) found; other complaints not examined; just satisfaction awarded for non-pecuniary damage; remainder of claims dismissed.
Orders
- Applications joined.
- Applications declared admissible under Article 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment