BASKHANOVA v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications - 25088/11 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1260 (03 July 2012)
Not applicable at this stage; the Court has communicated the case and posed questions to the parties regarding compliance with the six-month rule, State responsibility for the abductions, effectiveness of investigations, and the existence of effective remedies, referencing established ECHR jurisprudence on disappearances and procedural obligations.
- Citation
- [2012] ECHR 1260
- Parties
- Applicants: Petimat Khamzatovna Baskhanova and others (see Appendix); Respondent: Russia
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights (echr) / Communicated Case; Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties
- Outcome
- No final disposition; case communicated to the parties for observations.
- Legal Topics
- Enforced Disappearance, Right to Life (article 2 Echr), Prohibition of Torture (article 3 Echr), Right to Liberty and Security (article 5 Echr), Right to Respect for Private and Family Life (article 8 Echr), Right to an Effective Remedy (article 13 Echr), Right to Property (protocol No. 1, Article 1), State Responsibility, Effective Investigation, Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petimat Khamzatovna Baskhanova and others (see Appendix)
Applicants
Russia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights (echr) / Communicated Case; Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' relatives were abducted by State agents in violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the Convention
- 2 Whether the State failed to conduct an effective investigation into the abductions and disappearances
- 3 Whether the applicants suffered inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 3
Ratio Decidendi
Not applicable at this stage; the Court has communicated the case and posed questions to the parties regarding compliance with the six-month rule, State responsibility for the abductions, effectiveness of investigations, and the existence of effective remedies, referencing established ECHR jurisprudence on disappearances and procedural obligations.
Court Disposition
No final disposition; case communicated to the parties for observations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment