BASKHANOVA v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications - 25088/11 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1260 (03 July 2012)

BASKHANOVA v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications - 25088/11 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1260 (03 July 2012)

Not applicable at this stage; the Court has communicated the case and posed questions to the parties regarding compliance with the six-month rule, State responsibility for the abductions, effectiveness of investigations, and the existence of effective remedies, referencing established ECHR jurisprudence on disappearances and procedural obligations.

Citation
[2012] ECHR 1260
Parties
Applicants: Petimat Khamzatovna Baskhanova and others (see Appendix); Respondent: Russia
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
03 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights (echr) / Communicated Case; Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties
Outcome
No final disposition; case communicated to the parties for observations.
Legal Topics
Enforced Disappearance, Right to Life (article 2 Echr), Prohibition of Torture (article 3 Echr), Right to Liberty and Security (article 5 Echr), Right to Respect for Private and Family Life (article 8 Echr), Right to an Effective Remedy (article 13 Echr), Right to Property (protocol No. 1, Article 1), State Responsibility, Effective Investigation, Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petimat Khamzatovna Baskhanova and others (see Appendix)

Applicants

Russia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights (echr) / Communicated Case; Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties

  1. 1 Whether the applicants' relatives were abducted by State agents in violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the Convention
  2. 2 Whether the State failed to conduct an effective investigation into the abductions and disappearances
  3. 3 Whether the applicants suffered inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 3

Ratio Decidendi

Not applicable at this stage; the Court has communicated the case and posed questions to the parties regarding compliance with the six-month rule, State responsibility for the abductions, effectiveness of investigations, and the existence of effective remedies, referencing established ECHR jurisprudence on disappearances and procedural obligations.

Court Disposition

No final disposition; case communicated to the parties for observations.