Lagutin and Others v. Russia - 6228/09 19678/07 52340/08 7451/09 19123/09 - Legal Summary [2014] ECHR 516 (24 April 2014)
The domestic courts failed to adequately examine the applicants' allegations of police entrapment, did not clarify the content of the operational files, and accepted unconfirmed police statements without adversarial scrutiny, violating the applicants' right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] ECHR 516
- Parties
- Applicants: Lagutin and Others; Respondent: Russia
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment
- Outcome
- violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) unanimously found
- Legal Topics
- Fair Trial, Police Entrapment, Adversarial Proceedings, Equality of Arms
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lagutin and Others
Applicants
Russia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' convictions following police incitement violated their right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 2 Whether the domestic courts adequately examined allegations of police entrapment
Ratio Decidendi
The domestic courts failed to adequately examine the applicants' allegations of police entrapment, did not clarify the content of the operational files, and accepted unconfirmed police statements without adversarial scrutiny, violating the applicants' right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1.
Court Disposition
violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) unanimously found
Orders
- EUR 3,000 awarded to each applicant except the fourth for non-pecuniary damage
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment