Svetlana Mikhaylovna KALININA and Others v Russia - 43727/07 [2010] ECHR 1545 (23 September 2010)

Svetlana Mikhaylovna KALININA and Others v Russia - 43727/07 [2010] ECHR 1545 (23 September 2010)

The Court found that the enforcement of the domestic judgments in favour of the remaining applicants was completed within ten months, which complied with the requirements of the Convention. Therefore, the complaints were manifestly ill-founded and inadmissible.

Citation
[2010] ECHR 1545
Parties
Applicants: Svetlana Mikhaylovna Kalinina and Others; Respondent: Russian Federation
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
23 September 2010
Procedural Posture
Application to European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
Outcome
Application struck out and remainder declared inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Delayed Enforcement of Judgments, Right to a Fair Trial, Right to Property, Effective Remedy
Human Rights Law Civil Procedure Delayed Enforcement of Judgments Right to a Fair Trial Right to Property Effective Remedy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Svetlana Mikhaylovna Kalinina and Others

Applicants

Russian Federation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the delayed enforcement of domestic judgments violated Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention
  2. 2 Whether the applicants had an effective remedy under Article 13 of the Convention

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the enforcement of the domestic judgments in favour of the remaining applicants was completed within ten months, which complied with the requirements of the Convention. Therefore, the complaints were manifestly ill-founded and inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Application struck out and remainder declared inadmissible.

Orders

  • Application struck out as regards applicants who withdrew or whose claims lapsed due to death.
  • Remainder of the application declared inadmissible.