BISS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 51079/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 409 (14 May 2024)

BISS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 51079/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 409 (14 May 2024)

The Court found that the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not necessary in a democratic society and that the applicants' detention and administrative proceedings disclosed violations of Articles 5, 6, and 11 of the Convention, as well as relevant Protocols, in line with its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] ECHR 409
Parties
Applicants: Ivan Pavlovich Biss and Others; Respondent: Russian Federation
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
14 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Application Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Judgment After Joinder of Multiple Applications
Outcome
Applications allowed; violations found
Legal Topics
Freedom of Assembly, Unlawful Detention, Fair Trial, Proportionality of State Interference, Administrative Offences
Human Rights Law Administrative Law Freedom of Assembly Unlawful Detention Fair Trial Proportionality of State Interference Administrative Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 30
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ivan Pavlovich Biss and Others

Applicants

Russian Federation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Judgment After Joinder of Multiple Applications

  1. 1 Whether the measures taken against applicants as organisers or participants of public assemblies violated Article 11 of the Convention
  2. 2 Whether the applicants' detention and administrative proceedings violated other Convention rights, including Article 5 (right to liberty) and Article 6 (right to a fair trial)

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not necessary in a democratic society and that the applicants' detention and administrative proceedings disclosed violations of Articles 5, 6, and 11 of the Convention, as well as relevant Protocols, in line with its well-established case-law.

Court Disposition

Applications allowed; violations found

Orders

  • Joinder of applications
  • Declaration of jurisdiction for facts before 16 September 2022