Svetlana Borisovna ANISIMOVA and Others v Russia - 3215/04 [2010] ECHR 683 (11 May 2010)

Svetlana Borisovna ANISIMOVA and Others v Russia - 3215/04 [2010] ECHR 683 (11 May 2010)

Given the Government's acknowledgment of the violation, the compensation offered, and the applicants' agreement, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Respect for human rights does not require further examination.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] ECHR 683
Parties
Applicants: Svetlana Borisovna Anisimova and Others; Respondent: Russian Federation
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
11 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Striking Out Application Following Friendly Settlement
Outcome
Application struck out of the list of cases
Legal Topics
Non Enforcement of Judgments, Right to a Fair Trial, Right to Property, Effective Remedy
Human Rights Law Civil Procedure Non Enforcement of Judgments Right to a Fair Trial Right to Property Effective Remedy

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Svetlana Borisovna Anisimova and Others

Applicants

Russian Federation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Striking Out Application Following Friendly Settlement

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the delayed enforcement of domestic judgments violated Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention
  2. 2 Whether there was a lack of effective remedy under Article 13 of the Convention

Ratio Decidendi

Given the Government's acknowledgment of the violation, the compensation offered, and the applicants' agreement, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Respect for human rights does not require further examination.

Court Disposition

Application struck out of the list of cases

Orders

  • Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government's declarations
  • Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases