Vladimir Monyevich MAIZEL and Others v Russia - 17395/04 [2010] ECHR 2185 (14 December 2010)

Vladimir Monyevich MAIZEL and Others v Russia - 17395/04 [2010] ECHR 2185 (14 December 2010)

The Government acknowledged the excessive length of enforcement and offered compensation comparable to Court awards in similar cases; thus, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications, and the cases should be struck out of the list.

Citation
[2010] ECHR 2185
Parties
Applicants: Vladimir Monyevich Maizel and Others; Respondent: Russian Government
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
14 December 2010
Procedural Posture
European Court of Human Rights Application / Decision on Admissibility and Striking Out
Outcome
Applications joined; applications struck out of the list in respect of non-enforcement complaints; remainder declared inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Delayed Enforcement of Judgments, Just Satisfaction, Pilot Judgment Procedure, Striking Out Applications
Human Rights Law Civil Procedure Delayed Enforcement of Judgments Just Satisfaction Pilot Judgment Procedure Striking Out Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vladimir Monyevich Maizel and Others

Applicants

Russian Government

Respondent

Procedural Posture

European Court of Human Rights Application / Decision on Admissibility and Striking Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the delayed enforcement of final and enforceable domestic judgments in favour of the applicants violated the Convention
  2. 2 Whether the compensation offered by the Government constitutes just satisfaction
  3. 3 Whether the remainder of the complaints are manifestly ill-founded

Ratio Decidendi

The Government acknowledged the excessive length of enforcement and offered compensation comparable to Court awards in similar cases; thus, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications, and the cases should be struck out of the list.

Court Disposition

Applications joined; applications struck out of the list in respect of non-enforcement complaints; remainder declared inadmissible.

Orders

  • Applications joined
  • Applications struck out of the list in respect of non-enforcement complaints