GANATOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 44776/09 (Judgment : Article 2 - Right to life : Third Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 634 (24 September 2019)
The Court found that the Russian authorities failed to conduct effective investigations into the disappearances of the applicants' relatives, did not provide adequate redress, and did not acknowledge the violations. The compensations awarded domestically were insufficient and did not remove the applicants' victim...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] ECHR 634
- Parties
- Applicants: Ganatova and Others; Respondent: Russian Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Joined Applications Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Final Judgment by the European Court of Human Rights (third Section Committee)
- Outcome
- Applications allowed; violations found against Russia.
- Legal Topics
- Enforced Disappearance, Right to Life, Right to Liberty and Security, Right to Effective Remedy, Obligation to Investigate, State Responsibility
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ganatova and Others
Applicants
Russian Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Joined Applications Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Final Judgment by the European Court of Human Rights (third Section Committee)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Russian authorities violated the applicants' rights under the European Convention on Human Rights by failing to protect the right to life, liberty, and security of their relatives who disappeared after being detained by State agents.
- 2 Whether the investigations into the disappearances were effective and adequate as required by the Convention.
- 3 Whether the applicants lost their victim status due to domestic compensation or proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Russian authorities failed to conduct effective investigations into the disappearances of the applicants' relatives, did not provide adequate redress, and did not acknowledge the violations. The compensations awarded domestically were insufficient and did not remove the applicants' victim status. The State was held responsible for violations of the right to life, liberty, security, and effective remedy under the Convention.
Court Disposition
Applications allowed; violations found against Russia.
Orders
- Russian Federation held responsible for violations of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- State ordered to pay just satisfaction to applicants as specified in the appended table.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment