PATERSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 19923/10 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1136 (22 May 2012)
0 [ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> PATERSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 19923/10 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1136 (22 May...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] ECHR 1136
- Parties
- Applicant: Ryan Paterson; Respondent: The United Kingdom
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Communicated Case; Partial Decision on Admissibility Issued
- Legal Topics
- Right to Legal Assistance, Police Custody, Use of Evidence Obtained Without Legal Counsel
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ryan Paterson
Applicant
The United Kingdom
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Communicated Case; Partial Decision on Admissibility Issued
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lack of legal assistance during police custody and reliance on evidence obtained during that period violated Article 6 § 3 (c) in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
0 [ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> PATERSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 19923/10 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1136 (22 May 2012) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/1136.html Cite as: [2012] ECHR 1136 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FOURTH SECTION Application no. 19923/10 Ryan PATERSON against the United Kingdom lodged on 29 March 2010 The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court ’ s partial decision on admissibility, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 , on account of the lack of legal assistance to the applicant while he was in police custody and the reliance by the prosecution on the evidence obtained during his police interview ( Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008; Cadder v. HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43 ) ? BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/1136.html