Andre [2015] EUECJ C-23/15 (19 March 2015)

Andre [2015] EUECJ C-23/15 (19 March 2015)

The reference is manifestly inadmissible because it fails to provide any description of the factual or legal context or the reasons for seeking interpretation of EU law, as required by Article 267 TFEU and the Court's Rules of Procedure.

Citation
[2015] EUECJ C-23/15
Parties
Defendant: Sébastien Andre; Referring Court: Tribunal de première instance de Namur
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
19 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference) / Order on Admissibility
Outcome
reference declared manifestly inadmissible
Legal Topics
Preliminary Reference, Admissibility, Interpretation of EU Law, Procedural Requirements
European Union Law Criminal Law Preliminary Reference Admissibility Interpretation of EU Law Procedural Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sébastien Andre

Defendant

Tribunal de première instance de Namur

Referring Court

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Ruling (reference) / Order on Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the reference for a preliminary ruling is admissible in the absence of a description of the factual and legal background.

Ratio Decidendi

The reference is manifestly inadmissible because it fails to provide any description of the factual or legal context or the reasons for seeking interpretation of EU law, as required by Article 267 TFEU and the Court's Rules of Procedure.

Court Disposition

reference declared manifestly inadmissible

Orders

  • The request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance de Namur (Belgium), by decision of 24 November 2008 in Case C-23/15 is manifestly inadmissible.