Samira Achbita & Anor v G4S Secure Solutions NV [2016] EUECJ C-157/15 (31 May 2016)

Samira Achbita & Anor v G4S Secure Solutions NV [2016] EUECJ C-157/15 (31 May 2016)

A general company ban on visible religious, political, or philosophical symbols does not constitute direct discrimination under Directive 2000/78/EC if applied neutrally to all employees, but may constitute indirect discrimination if it puts persons of a particular religion at a disadvantage. Such indirect discrimination can be justified if the employer pursues a legitimate aim, such as a policy of neutrality, and the measure is appropriate, necessary, and proportionate. The assessment of proportionality and justification must consider the specific context, the nature of the employee's role, and the impact on the employee's rights.

Citation
[2016] EUECJ C-157/15
Parties
Applicant: Samira Achbita; Applicant: Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding; Respondent: G4S Secure Solutions NV
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
31 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Opinion of Advocate General Before Final Judgment
Outcome
Opinion: The ban does not constitute direct discrimination but may constitute indirect discrimination, which can be justified under certain conditions.
Legal Topics
Religious Discrimination, Employment Equality, Dress Codes, Freedom of Religion, Indirect Discrimination, Direct Discrimination, Justification of Discrimination, Directive 2000/78/ec
Labour Law Anti Discrimination Law EU Law Human Rights Religious Discrimination Employment Equality Dress Codes Freedom of Religion +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samira Achbita

Applicant

Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding

Applicant

G4S Secure Solutions NV

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Opinion of Advocate General Before Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does a private employer's general ban on visible religious, political, or philosophical symbols at work constitute direct or indirect discrimination under Directive 2000/78/EC?
  2. 2 Can such a ban be justified under EU law, and if so, under what conditions?

Ratio Decidendi

A general company ban on visible religious, political, or philosophical symbols does not constitute direct discrimination under Directive 2000/78/EC if applied neutrally to all employees, but may constitute indirect discrimination if it puts persons of a particular religion at a disadvantage. Such indirect discrimination can be justified if the employer pursues a legitimate aim, such as a policy of neutrality, and the measure is appropriate, necessary, and proportionate. The assessment of proportionality and justification must consider the specific context, the nature of the employee's role, and the impact on the employee's rights.

Court Disposition

Opinion: The ban does not constitute direct discrimination but may constitute indirect discrimination, which can be justified under certain conditions.