Sanford v EUIPO (Appeal - Community design - Order) [2022] EUECJ C-19/22P_CO (06 April 2022)

Sanford v EUIPO (Appeal - Community design - Order) [2022] EUECJ C-19/22P_CO (06 April 2022)

The appellant failed to provide sufficient, detailed, and specific information to demonstrate that the appeal raises an issue significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law, as required by Article 58a of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure.

Citation
[2022] EUECJ C-19/22P_CO
Parties
Appellant: Sanford LP; Defendant at First Instance: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); Intervener at First Instance: Avery Zweckform GmbH
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
06 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Appeal Community Design / Order on Whether Appeal May Proceed
Outcome
Appeal not allowed to proceed
Legal Topics
Community Design, Appeal Procedure, Significance for Unity, Consistency or Development of EU Law
Intellectual Property Law European Union Law Community Design Appeal Procedure Significance for Unity, Consistency or Development of EU Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sanford LP

Appellant

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant at First Instance

Avery Zweckform GmbH

Intervener at First Instance

Procedural Posture

Appeal Community Design / Order on Whether Appeal May Proceed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal raises an issue significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law under Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to provide sufficient, detailed, and specific information to demonstrate that the appeal raises an issue significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law, as required by Article 58a of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure.

Court Disposition

Appeal not allowed to proceed

Orders

  • The appeal is not allowed to proceed.
  • Sanford LP shall bear its own costs.