O'Byrne (Environment and consumers) [2006] EUECJ C-127/04 (09 February 2006)
Article 11 of Directive 85/374/EEC means a product is put into circulation when it leaves the producer's manufacturing process and enters the marketing process in the form offered to the public. Substitution of the correct producer as defendant is governed by national law, but must respect the Directive's personal scope as defined in Articles 1 and 3.
- Citation
- [2006] EUECJ C-127/04
- Parties
- Claimant: Declan O'Byrne; Defendant: Sanofi Pasteur MSD Ltd (formerly Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd); Defendant: Sanofi Pasteur SA (formerly Aventis Pasteur SA)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Reference for Preliminary Ruling / Preliminary Ruling Before the Court of Justice of the European Union
- Outcome
- Questions answered; interpretation of EU law provided to referring court.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Article 11 of Directive 85/374/eec, Limitation Period for Product Liability, Definition of 'put Into Circulation', Substitution of Parties in Product Liability Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Declan O'Byrne
Claimant
Sanofi Pasteur MSD Ltd (formerly Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd)
Defendant
Sanofi Pasteur SA (formerly Aventis Pasteur SA)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Reference for Preliminary Ruling / Preliminary Ruling Before the Court of Justice of the European Union
Legal Issues
- 1 When is a product considered 'put into circulation' under Article 11 of Directive 85/374/EEC?
- 2 Can national law allow substitution of the correct producer as defendant after the limitation period if proceedings were initially brought against the wrong entity?
Ratio Decidendi
Article 11 of Directive 85/374/EEC means a product is put into circulation when it leaves the producer's manufacturing process and enters the marketing process in the form offered to the public. Substitution of the correct producer as defendant is governed by national law, but must respect the Directive's personal scope as defined in Articles 1 and 3.
Court Disposition
Questions answered; interpretation of EU law provided to referring court.
Orders
- Article 11 of Directive 85/374/EEC is to be interpreted as meaning that a product is put into circulation when it is taken out of the manufacturing process operated by the producer and enters a marketing process in the form in which it is offered to the public in order to be used or consumed.
- When an action is brought against a company mistakenly considered to be the producer, national law determines substitution conditions, but the court must respect the Directive's personal scope.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment