SECAP (Law relating to undertakings) French Text [2007] EUECJ C-148/06_O (27 November 2007)
The principles of free competition, transparency, non-discrimination, and the right to good administration under EU law preclude national rules that require automatic exclusion of abnormally low tenders in public procurement without a contradictory verification procedure, even for contracts not covered by the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] EUECJ C-148/06_O
- Parties
- Applicant: SECAP SpA; Respondent: Comune di Torino
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference for a Preliminary Ruling) / Opinion of Advocate General
- Outcome
- Proposed answer to the referring court (Advocate General's Opinion): National rules requiring automatic exclusion of abnormally low tenders without contradictory verification are contrary to EU law principles.
- Legal Topics
- Public Contracts, Abnormally Low Tenders, Principles of Non Discrimination, Transparency, Right to Be Heard, Application of EU Law to Non Harmonised Contracts
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SECAP SpA
Applicant
Comune di Torino
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference for a Preliminary Ruling) / Opinion of Advocate General
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 30(4) of Directive 93/37/CEE establishes a fundamental principle of EU law applicable to public contracts not covered by the directive
- 2 Whether automatic exclusion of abnormally low tenders without a hearing is compatible with EU law principles
Ratio Decidendi
The principles of free competition, transparency, non-discrimination, and the right to good administration under EU law preclude national rules that require automatic exclusion of abnormally low tenders in public procurement without a contradictory verification procedure, even for contracts not covered by the procurement directives, where the contract is of cross-border interest.
Court Disposition
Proposed answer to the referring court (Advocate General's Opinion): National rules requiring automatic exclusion of abnormally low tenders without contradictory verification are contrary to EU law principles.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment