Shchiglitsov against Estonia - 35062/03 [2009] ECHR 1755 (30 September 2009)
The excessive length of the applicant's civil proceedings constituted a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] ECHR 1755
- Parties
- Applicant: Shchiglitsov; Respondent: Estonia
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment
- Outcome
- case closed; execution of judgment completed
- Legal Topics
- Excessive Length of Proceedings, Right to a Fair Trial, Article 6 ECHR
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shchiglitsov
Applicant
Estonia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of civil proceedings violated Article 6, paragraph 1, of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The excessive length of the applicant's civil proceedings constituted a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
Court Disposition
case closed; execution of judgment completed
Orders
- Respondent state paid EUR 1,200 in just satisfaction to the applicant.
- Civil proceedings have been closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Shchiglitsov against Estonia - 35062/03 [2009] ECHR 1755 (30 September 2009) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/1755.html Cite as: [2009] ECHR 1755 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] Resolution CM/ResDH(2009)93 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Shchiglitsov against Estonia (Application No. 35062/03, judgment of 18/01/2007, final on 18/04/2007) The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”); Having regard to the judgment, transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become final; Recalling that the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case concerns the excessive length of civil proceedings (violation of Article 6, paragraph 1) (see details in Appendix); Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgment; Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention; Having satisfied itself that, within the time-limit set, the respondent state paid the applicant the just satisfaction provided in the judgment (see details in Appendix), Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded by the Court in its judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate: - of individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and - of general measures preventing similar violations; DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state (see Appendix), that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and DECIDES to close the examination of this case. Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2009)93 Information about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of Shchiglitsov against Estonia Introductory case summary This case concerns the excessive length of civil proceedings (violation of Article 6, paragraph 1). The proceedings lasted between 1997 and 2003. I. Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures a) Details of just satisfaction Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Total - EUR EUR 1 200 EUR Paid on 19/06/2007 b) Individual measures The civil proceedings have been closed. II. General measures The Estonian authorities had already taken the necessary measures to prevent similar violations following the judgment of 2 December 2003 in the case of Treial (see Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)152). The Estonian authorities consider that the violation found in this case was a result of several vacancies on the bench in the Narva City Court at the time. Since 2003, the vacancies have been filled. However, this situation did not reflect a general structural deficiency in the Estonian judicial system. The judgment has been translated into Estonian and published on the internet site of the Council of Europe Information Centre in Tallinn ( www.coe.ee ). It was also sent out to all domestic courts and other institutions concerned. III. Conclusions of the respondent state The government considers that the measures adopted will prevent similar violations and that Estonia has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1 of the Convention. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 September 2009 at the 1065th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/1755.html